The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1515 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
Thank you very much.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
They were long questions and I ran them together. I merely expressed a view that international benchmarking could be desirable, particularly thinking about Nora Senior’s comment about digital technologies and the threat of competition from digital technologies. We might choose not to benchmark internationally across every sector, but we have already discussed doing that in the emerging sectors. I just wanted to see whether, in principle, you agree with the view that international benchmarking is a good thing.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
Nora, I will pick up on Lisa Pattoni’s comment that employers drive the take-up of modern apprenticeships and that they therefore have a role in the figures that I outlined for female enrolments. We both encounter systemic issues in relation to the role of women in business and various other sectors; do you have any final reflections on that point before we move on?
You are on silent, Nora.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 8 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
I invite SDS to respond my last question, which I appreciate was a slightly cheeky one. I wanted to wind up the session with a bit of fun.
Chris, you are on silent.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
I take it from that that you, on behalf of your members and your member organisations, will be reflecting on that matter, given the often long-term nature of property.
Given that diversity makes an economic contribution, what are the SPF’s reflections on supporting women to lead the businesses that it represents?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
I assume from that that you might look at the membership of your policy team. When I checked today, I found that your policy team has three women and 23 men, which means that women make up less than 12 per cent.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
In your submission, you call for
“greater capitalisation of the Scottish National Investment Bank”.
I agree with that view. You also comment on the need for a “National Infrastructure Agency”. I also agree with that view. In that light, would you support increased borrowing powers for the Scottish Government to enable those much grander ideas to be taken forward? I am a bit concerned that, throughout our discussion, we have tended to focus on small taxes, such as LBTT, rather than on the shifts that will really make a difference to economic growth.
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
I think there is just one more response. Adam, did you want to contribute before we finish off this thread?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
I thank Joanne Walker very much for her submission, which I enjoyed greatly. However, in the interests of time, I will confine my questions to Mr Robertson. I should declare that I have an interest in some buy-to-let property and that I am an ambassador for the all-party parliamentary group on fair business banking, which is based at Westminster.
I want to gently challenge you, Mr Robertson, in relation to the discussion that came up earlier about your comment that
“our well-respected property legal system is being undermined by changes to the landlord-tenant relationship”,
which you say
“could create a barrier to much needed future investment.”
In light of the considerable uncertainty in the trading environment, surely as big a factor is access to finance for businesses and the risk appetite of lenders, be they private equity or banks. Do you accept that that is the case?
Finance and Public Administration Committee
Meeting date: 7 September 2021
Michelle Thomson
I will move on to another area that we have not yet touched on. I am interested in your organisation’s reflections on the desire for home working, or at least a version of hybrid working, that has arisen—indeed, we can see it in our meeting today. How will that cause and necessitate change for the people who you represent?