Skip to main content

Language: English / GĂ idhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Corrections and changes to the Official Report

If you think that a draft Official Report doesn’t accurately reflect what you said, you can ask us to review it. Only the person whose words were reported can ask for a review – no one else can do it for them. You must do this within 20 working days of the report’s publication date.

How to request a correction: guidance for MSPs and witnesses

You can suggest corrections:

  • in person
  • by email
  • by sending a printout with your corrections marked up

The editor will consider your request. We can correct anything that we got wrong and make changes that fit with our remit to be substantially verbatim and agree with our house style guide.

You may not ask for corrections that:

  • change the meaning of what you said
  • add extra information

We will usually make any agreed corrections as soon as possible, but certainly within 35 working days of the report’s publication date. After that time, Official Reports are finalised and cannot be changed again.

MSP corrections

If an MSP supplies incorrect information that the Official Report cannot correct, they can use the members’ corrections mechanism.

This was recommended in the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee’s 7th report (session 3).

The guidance for Members gives more information about requesting a correction:

Members’ corrections guidance (163KB pdf)

Latest corrections

 

When a member has made a request to correct inaccurate information provided in Parliamentary proceedings and it satisfies the relevant criteria, the corrections will be published on this page.

Guidance on this process, including the admissibility criteria, can be found in the members corrections guidance (163KB pdf).


Correction

Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee -  27 February 2024

Minister for Energy, Just Transition and Fair Work (Gillian Martin)

The Minister for Energy, Just Transition and Fair Work has identified errors in her contributions and provided the following corrections: 

 At col 3, paragraph 6

Original text—


“There is concern that, if we do not make the exemption for energy intensive industries, particularly in the high fuel price situation that we have at the moment” 

Corrected text—

“There is concern that, if we do not make the exemption for energy intensive industries, particularly in the high electricity price situation that we have at the moment” 

At col 4, paragraph 1

Original text—

"That will amount to quite a substantial sum if you think about the huge amount of fuel that is used by those particular industries."

Corrected text—

"That will amount to quite a substantial sum if you think about the huge amount of electricity that is used by those particular industries."

At col 5, paragraph 1

Original text—

"but this particular exemption is about large manufacturers that are particularly affected by inflation and high fuel costs"

Corrected text—


"but this particular exemption is about large manufacturers that are particularly affected by inflation and high electricity costs"

 

Previous corrections 

When a member has made a request to correct inaccurate information provided in Parliamentary proceedings and it satisfies the relevant criteria, the corrections will be published on this page.

Guidance on this process, including the admissibility criteria, can be found in the members corrections guidance (163KB pdf).


Errata

Very occasionally an editorial correction is required after the Official Report is finalised. Such corrections are entirely at the discretion of the Editor and will be published on this page.


Erratum

Meeting of the Parliament – 8 September 2022

The Minister for Transport (Jenny Gilruth)

There is an error in the contribution of Jenny Gilruth.

At col 82, paragraph 10—

Published text—

“we will not be pursuing any routes that look to privatisation in the future, and we are always considering unbundling.”

Corrected text—

“we will not be pursuing any routes that look to privatisation in the future, nor are we considering unbundling.”