Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 18 January 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2875 contributions

|

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Economic Recovery

Meeting date: 15 September 2021

Colin Beattie

Could you have a standard portfolio of conditions that would apply to all applicants and then other conditions that would apply more selectively to a business?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Economic Recovery

Meeting date: 15 September 2021

Colin Beattie

Is it something that you are considering?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Economic Recovery

Meeting date: 15 September 2021

Colin Beattie

If we are looking to have an inclusive economy, should we have that incorporated as, perhaps, inclusive growth within the conditions automatically?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Economic Recovery

Meeting date: 15 September 2021

Colin Beattie

Jane, will you comment on your statement in your written submission that, in designing your processes, you looked at things

“differently by not putting too many, if any, criteria”

against anybody applying for them. Will you give us some more detail on that and what it means in relation to any conditionality?

Economy and Fair Work Committee

Economic Recovery

Meeting date: 15 September 2021

Colin Beattie

Did you catch the question?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report

Meeting date: 9 September 2021

Colin Beattie

What discussions have you had with the Scottish Government on that?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report

Meeting date: 9 September 2021

Colin Beattie

I have one last question on this subject. We have highlighted in questioning that there is disparity in the indicators in respect of the prominence of exam performance versus the wider outcomes. In your report, you make it clear that the Scottish Government and local authorities should be working together to ensure that more prominence is given to the balance. Is there any indication that is happening?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report

Meeting date: 9 September 2021

Colin Beattie

It seems to me that indicators are there to inform and guide us on future investment and future focus on where we put resources. If the current indicators do not do that, is there a case for saying that however comparable they might be, and however accurate they might be, we need different indicators in order to extract more detailed or cogent information that will allow us to take decisions? Is that possible?

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report

Meeting date: 9 September 2021

Colin Beattie

So, variation in indicators must be directly comparable between councils. In spite of variations in numbers of teachers and all the other things, the indicators themselves should be robust.

Public Audit Committee

Section 23 Report

Meeting date: 9 September 2021

Colin Beattie

I will follow on from that. Given that, in a number of councils, indicators have gone the wrong way, are there any signs, looking across the board, that there is a common denominator? Is it mostly to do with schools in more deprived areas? Is there a social element? Is there a physical element? Is there anything that you can point to as the cause of indicators going down in a particular place?